Cambridge 8 test1 task 2
Some people think that parents should teach children how to be good members of society. Others, however, believe that school is the place to learn this.
Discuss both these views and give your own opinion.

Some people are of the opinion that teaching children to become a good member is one of the parental duties, others, including me, argue that schools should prepare children for this purpose.
On the one hand, a group of people put forward one main argument to support the idea that children should be educated by parents has great benefits. According to these people, children before entering to schools, they spend a vast amount of their time at home and they record all the things that are needed to become a good member. This means that children are growing beside their parents and they are nurtured by parents. Therefore, parents have a vital role in teaching children to make a good member for society. The parents ought to teach children for this.
On the other hand, others, including me, state two plausible reasons due to which children are educated at schools to become a good and beneficial person for society. First of all, when children turn 7, they go to school. This means that because schoolchildren can’t distinguish between good and bad things, they need a good instruction. In order for all teachers were educated by the scientific methods at university, if children are taught by teachers, they will presumably become a good person for society. Additionally, personality often is developed until 19 that is the age of schoolchild. In other words, children spend a vast amount of time at school, therefore, school has enormous impact on children. Therefore, the best way that children can learn, is schools.
In conclusion, I have a deep conviction that school has the most important role in the society, which comprises people. almost all people go to school and they spent a large amount of time at school and also teachers have been taught by the best methods that they prepare for teach children. Hence, children that are educated at schools become better citizens.

TASK 1
Write a letter to your friend about your plans to go out with him/her and another friend on a small picnic. Include the following in your letter:
– where you plan to go
– what arrangements you already made
– what help you need from your friend with this picnic.

Dear Sam,
I hope you are doing well. As we talked last week, I am planning to have an expedition on the next weekend together with you and Sarah. I have researched about some places around Ghale Roudkhan where can be so adventurous for us. It is one of the most pristine parts of Qazvin province. I would like to know your attitude about it too. This season is suitable time of the year in that region to have a wonderful experience in a tent in middle of Jungle. I will send you more detail about the equipment which we have to be taken for camping. Furthermore, for transportation we need to go there by our own cars. My car will not be available for that specific time because of its service date. I would like to ask you to let me know about your car availability for the next week. I will discuss this issue with Sarah too, maybe whether you or her take car.
I am waiting your prompt feedback my friend.
Sincerely,
Pooria

TASK 2
Some believe that people should not continue to work once they reach the age of retirement. Do you agree or disagree? Give reasons for your answer and include relevant examples from your experience.
Let me answer this question in this way that I am agree and disagree to work after being retired. There are many factors which impact people’s attitude about this question, such as economical statue. Maybe economic issues in that condition is one of reason but also some people do not just pay attention to the financial aspect of it such as people who are preferred to be active and social by working. Therefore, it completely depends on life approach and other factor such as being involved in an activity.
Truly speaking, I prefer to travel and spend my life to the activities which are not possible to do them till that time in this life. Although, I am conscious about that it is easy to said than done but it is my current idea about devoting my life to my interests such as doing Tango or maybe playing piano. In addition to that, I would like to be active as a volunteer in charities. Maybe as a retired one, this would make me happier than other activities.
According to my grandpa’s experience, spending time with grandsons and family member was more valuable in comparison to working for hours on end in automation industry, despite that he spent all of his retirement years in industry far from his family. So briefly speaking, he was a workaholic character which in spite of his instinct family love, he could not prevent his working appetite in rest of his life.
As a conclusion, each person actions and preferences can be completely different from his/her interests so as a result this question has to be answered according to retirement circumstances in that specific time, I could no answer it exactly today. This question can be replied by me at least twenty years later, not today.

Question:
Some people think that universities should provide graduates with the knowledge and skills needed in the workplace. Others think that the true function of a university should be to give access to knowledge for its own sake, regardless of whether the course is useful to an employers.
What, in your opinion, shoul be the main function of a university?
Answer:
People have different views about whether universities should prepare students for workplaces or guild them to improve the knowledge. While it is necessary to have graduated people who are adroit in working situations, I am of the opinion that the main function of universities have to be broadening of knowledge. This can be discussed with the following reasons enunciated with a priority of importance.
First and foremost, it is knowledge which generally creates technology. Knowledge causes discovering of theoretical issues, in turn, leading an array of machines to be manufactured. One particular salient example of this is satellite. Having completed theoretical subjects in universities for a couple of decades, Nasa decided to build and launch one to space. Therefore, for technology to be improved, first step is to create theoretical issues which have to be done by universities. Actually, it is the basic knowledge which only universities can improve.
Seen from other way round, what universities need for studying on basic knowledge is money. As most of universities all around the globe are private, so difficult is it to provide enough fund. One practical wy to iron out this problem is to earn this budget from companies. So there are found many universities insinting that students have to solve workplace problems, in which case after graduating, working at companies a large number of students find easy to deal with.
Having reviewed both side of universities functions, I can but reaffirm my position that whereas the foremost function of universities should be improving the knowledge itself. Making money for providing enough equipment leads to prepare students for working at companies.

میشه دقیقن بگید برای تعیین سطح باید چه کار کرد؟

-Some people claim that not enough of the waste from homes is recycled.
They say that the only way to increase recycling is for governments to make it a legal requirement.
To what extent do you think laws are needed to make people recycle more of their waste?
– Irrefutably household waste has been increasing rapidly in recent decades and it needs to be recycled to prevent harms to environment. A certain number of individuals assert that the amount of the recycled household waste are deficient , hence they believe that a mere way to expand recycling is for governments to make it a legal demand. This essay agrees with that notion to some extent and will examine why governments need to set laws to force individuals recycle a greater extent of their waste.
First and foremost , the environment must be protected by every individuals and government plays a key role to motivate people taking part in that vital responsibility. Despite the fact that many people take the responsibility without setting laws to recycle more of their waste , a certain number of them specially teenagers do not count it as an essential issue and they need to be forced by government to take part in it . For instance in my country the government is not concerned about the amount of recycled waste thus most individuals do not take part in increasing them hence the implication is that our environment is not as clear as it was in last years.
In addition, the deficient amount of recycling household waste could lead to a polluted environment that will render various types of diseases for people and eventually it will cause more deaths. However, obliging individuals to expand recycled waste by the government will lead to a healthy community. For example recent researches in developed countries have shown that the disease rate has been abated in recent years while the government had enforced laws to protect the environment.
By and large, the cited evidence strongly prove that I am an advocate if this approach and we ought to appreciate the beauty of our environment and take the responsibility to recycle a greater amount of household waste and the government should force individuals to make a healthy environment.