تصحیح رایگان رایتینگ آیلتس (تسک 1 و 2)

towns and cities are attractive places. some people suggest that the government should spend money putting in more works of art like painting and statues to make them better to live in. do you agree or disagree?
Rural areas are attractive places, so it is believed by some that the authorities ought to spend money buying different kind of art works including painting and statues to make towns and cities better places. Although artistic works can make an area more beautiful, I think that the government should allocate its budget to increase facilities and amenities.
In my opinion, more budget should be allocated by authorities to public transport and education. People would be happier, if they can commute comfortable and easy in cities. Thus, the government should provide rural areas with more routes and vehicles to avoid traffic congestion and pollution. Furthermore, towns will be a better place for living, when students benefit from well-rounded education to pursuit their dreams and find their favorite job. Having plenty of job opportunities available to ensure the financial security and good prospect of promotion is also another crucial factor. In other word, the more there are occupational opportunities, the more people, especially younger generations, are satisfied with living in a city.
Another point to consider, in my view, is that the government should develop the facilities to enhance the standards of living. Take, for example residents who suffer from a disease. The need effective healthcare system, which help them to recover as soon as possible, not beautiful statues. Therefore, modern clinics and hospitals are more beneficial for citizens than works of art. Secondly, by constructing more shopping malls, recreational centers and green spaces, people will benefit more. The can enjoy being with their beloved ones, which can lift their spirits and make them more satisfied.
In conclusion, while works of art might make a city picturesque, allocating more money to increase the facilities will make rural areas better places to live in.

Some people say that the main environmental problem of our time is the loss of particular species of plants and animals. Others say that there are more important environmental problems.

Discuss both these views and give your own opinion.

Today, due to industrialization and overpopulation, all nations have to struggle with a lot of issues from concern about the extinction of specific flora and fauna to some others like pollution or even congestion. While it is argued that the former would be the most vital problem, others say we should consider other important phenomena which more related to humankind. Personally speaking, both views have something to concern. In this essay, I will explain how those issues would have nearly the same consequences.

To begin with, the main reason why environmentalists try to raise awareness of people about the extinction of some species is that mankind like any creature has a unique place in the food chain. Primarily, the food chain is all about the interconnectedness between hunters and prey. What this means is that, if some animals did not exist in the cycle, everything could go wrong. For example, the existence of humans heavily depends on crops and meats. Largely thanks to insects, crops can grow and breed. As well as this, many livestock is fed with vegetables. Because of this cycle, fresh commodities and meats can be produced for society’s need.

On the other hand, some people more often say that many cities already have a demanding problem with their traffic congestion and air pollution. Moreover, they say if we were not able to tackle such a problematic situation, the world slid into emptiness. Mainly this trend traced back to overpopulation and consumerism. Nowadays, people tend to, for instance, use their cars rather than using public transport. In addition to that, because of consumerism, household cast-offs have been increasing dramatically over the last decades.

In conclusion, although it is thought losing species would affect humankind’s existence, it is also argued pollution in megacities would be harmful than the distinction of animals. To my mind, the probability of the existence of man equally relies on both views.
[Cambridge Ielts 14 Academic, Test 2, Task 2]

Cambridge 12 – General – Test 8

Local stores appear to be less trendy in recent years as many prefer shopping in huge, fancy malls and shopping centers. I believe that this is a negative trend and the principal reasons for this argument are as follows.

Local shops have been supplying needs of neighborhoods for years and many of them have turned into family businesses which are managed by immediate members of a family – in some occasions- for several generations. These newly boomed malls are acting as a hamper for them to gain profit which would lead to be bankrupted, and consequently many families could lose their job and business. This unemployment does not merely impact individuals or families, but also it is detrimental for the whole society since it may bring societal issues as well as economic challenges.

Another reason is that this approach to shopping requires driving for miles which seems to be highly disadvantageous. First of all, it adds millions tonnes of carbon to atmosphere aiding destruction of Ozone layer and exacerbating global warming. Secondly, it causes traffic congestion s resulting in wasting huge amount of people’s time and energy – that could be spent on efficient activities – and burning fuel to exceed. Finally, it would uplift sedentary lifestyle among families which is considered to be source of various health issues such as obesity and cardiovascular ailments. While they used to walk a distance to purchase their needs, now they merely sit and drive to the shopping center.

By way of conclusion, I once again, reaffirm my position that disappearing of local businesses and retail outlets is an inappropriate development given the fact that it fosters many issues such as unemployment and poor health.

levels of youth crime are increasing rapidly in most cities around the world. what are the reasons for this and suggest some solutions.

In various cities around the world, levels of youth crime are rising. While some advocate view that need seriously attention to reasons for why occur this problem, the other insist that find significantly solutions are more important than reasons. This assay will examine both sides of the debate.

Firstly, unfortunately these days young people are encouraging to find easy ways to achieve money. For example they try illegal activities like smuggling and join organized crime. By doing this, increasing crime rate between them more and more. In addition, some of them do not have appropriate opportunities to study at university and find job. This is because, in modern life style the education fee is high and the parents rarely can supporting their children to continue education. Consequently, the person without any educational and job specialty can not find legal job to support himself and even family. So leads to mugging, burglary, robbery and smuggling at night clubs or parks with another young persons.

There are two main measures. In the first place, government play important role in these cities. They have to creating new job opportunities to youth people with high salary. For example establishing society association to find their talents. As a result, occur two phenomenon: growing society economic and decreasing offence rate. A further step is declining education fee at universities and planning to give scholarship for poor persons. For example according to new survey from low crime rate countries, training system is one off the effective ways to control youth future life.

In conclusion, crime is a kind of epidemic problem in these days. Poverty, comfort and absorb easy ways to earning money are popular reasons to do. Moreover family and government have to devote more attention to education.

استاد محترم به عنوان تاپیک از سری کتای های شما به من معرفی شد ولی متاسفانه پیدا نکردم. ممنون میشم لطف کنید بررسی کنید. سپاسگزارم

Cambridge 13, test3, task 2
These days, due to the progress of technology there are an enormous of gadgets which people can select between them for watching a movie. While some people believe that we can see films on modern gadgets such as such phones, there are others who think to watch the movie in the cinema is more enjoyable, rather than other ways. In my honest opinion, I would argue that it is better to watch movies in the cinema. This essay will discuss both points of view.
On the one hand, the option to watch a film on phones and somethings like that is attractive for several reasons. Many people want to see a movie with friends and sometimes have a struggle with some sequences of the movie which is impossible in a place like cinema because it is a major disturbance for others. In this way, they can watch it at home and have some fun through it. in addition to this, in several situations, persons would see an old film. This means that those cannot go to the cinema since cinemas do not show oldies. And the last point, play a film on phones and so on means that it is possible to see a movie any time and you are not depending on the cinema’s scheduled time-table.
On the other hand, I believe that it is more enjoyable to watch a movie at the cinema. First and foremost, it is about the screen. The cinema screen is wide enough which give persons good feeling through watching the movie. Secondly, the cinema provides Dolby and stereo sound and people could easily imagine themselves in locations. this feature is just happening in the cinema hall. Finally, the cinema has an impact atmosphere and lets persons share their feeling together in some scenes of the movie. For example, when you see a funny scene, you can laugh loud with others and transfer your emotions which you could not find it in your phone or laptop.
For the reasons mentioned above, it seems to me that watching a movie in the cinema is more likely to be fascinating if you care about what you watch.

Some people buy their children a large number of toys to play with.
What are the advantages and disadvantages for the child of having a large number of toys?

One of the common elements of everyone life as a child is to play with toys. Some people believe that they should provide their children with as many playthings as possible, but whether or not it is advantageous, is a moot point. In this essay, the benefits and drawbacks of having several toys to play with will be discussed.

The main advantage is that children are entertained. This is because they have an array of options to choose from and thus never get bored to death. When children are enjoying their time, parents will also find the opportunity to spend some time on their personal interests, rather than their children. This is of vital importance because if they do not experience a joyful and ecstatic life, there will be a chance that they will start growing negative feelings towards their offspring, which may deteriorate the relationship between the members of a family.

Many psychologists have repetitively mentioned that it is crucial for young people to be in touch and interact face-to-face with their peers, whereas having access to a multitude of toys may result in the exclusion of children from social interactions with friends and families. The reason is that if we want to have better personal and professional lives in the future, we must hone our social skills when we are younger and have the luxury of trial and error, which will not be acceptable when we are grown-up. For instance, a behavior which is considered to be unacceptable in our work may result that we get fired.

To sum up, although playing with numerous toys might be useful for children as it provides them and their parents with enjoyable time, it might be detrimental to their communication skills and lack of this may have catastrophic consequences when they become adults.

Some people think that schools should select students according to their academic abilities. Others believe that it is better to have students with different abilities studying together. Discuss both views and give your opinion.

There are many students who have different abilities. Some think that schools should choose students according to their academic skills, while there are who believe that it is better students with a variety of abilities study together. In my opinion, I believe that students with different skills should be together.
On the one hand, the option to select students based on their educational abilities is attractive for several reasons. Teaching students who have an equal academic level is easier. This means that, when a group of learners has an equal range of academic skills, the teacher can easily go to the next step because all students understand the lessons as well, and there is no need to repeat lessons just for a few students and can focus on specific issues, instead of, lessons with lower importance. Another reason is when the knowledge of students is at the same level, the time of the class never wastes because of those students who cannot realize the lesson as others.
On the other hand, I believe that it is more beneficial for pupils to study together. Firstly, children who are weak, have to study more and more and improve themselves to keep up with other classmates. Secondly, this diversity of skills can be useful to students because they can learn lessons together with a common language, and in between, these children learn about teamwork and social interactions. For example, when some students could not solve mathematical problems, other classmates who are cleverer can help weaker individuals to learn and solve practices. Finally, it is a competitive atmosphere for learning and student can become a successful person.
In conclusion, for the reasons mentioned above, it seems to me that students are more likely to be successful in their educational life and follow their career in the future if they study in schools where there are all kinds of students with different talents and skills.

It is evident that there are many academic
subjects which are represented in educational system all around the world. While some people often argue that history should be considered as the most magnificent academic field for teaching students, other people have different views toward this mater. Although I believe that history is unavoidable course, other academic fields would be certainly more beneficial for students.
On the one hand, history has a key role to play in education system, as some people assert that it should be necessary for schools and education ministry to pay more attention to this matter. Firstly, history is a basic element and identity for each country. Student could be familiar with information about their ancestors and culture that assist them in improving their country. Pupils are likely to acquire knowledge by studying many events which took place in the past, and they would take the best approach to handle some national crises due to their experience. Secondly, understanding of country’s historical background could be an effective tool to grow many positive characteristics inside teenagers. For example, students could learn kindness, unity, avoiding any tension from previous domestic wars between local people and various dynasties which these cause a country to lag behind the rest of the globe.
On the other hand, in my personal view, the needs of people and diversity in their life styles have led to they have to study updated and state of the art subjects, especially in our fast changing universe. Each society needs many experts with different levels and widespread professional knowledge who could improve political, social and international status of their countries. In addition, there is a global competition between nations in all dimensions, therefore, science and technology based subject and teaching in schools and universities will pave the way of achieving prospects.
In conclusion, although history course should not be eliminated from education schedules among schools or tertiary education, learning of other subjects are more vital.
Cambridge13-test3

Cambridge 11.Test 2,Task 2.
Some people say that in all level of education, from primary
schools to universities, too much time is spent on learning facts and not enough to learning practical skills.
Do you agree or disagree?

Some people believe that educational system dedicated much time to theoretical lessons compared with practical trainings. In my opinion, this is right idea and this system needs to be reformed.

I agree that students have to spend most of their educational time just on studying lessons. The first reason is that, a glance at education curriculums in schools and universities shows that a sizable time of these programs are theories and practical trainings have just a small portion. I remember, when I was a teenager, I had to learn many lessons such as mathematics and physics in class and there were not any practical education for them. So for most part of our studying we just kept in mind complicated formulas without using them in our daily life or ever having information about what they can be used in life.

One the other hand, young people have to work as an apprentice after obtaining qualifications. It reveals that their knowledge can not meet the expectations of work market. When a new graduated person is in search of finding a job in their major will cope with questions about their practical skills. This is a serious barrier to find a decent job. Therefore, lacking of sufficient applicable experiences completely is clear.

To sum up, I think we can observe that students in all grades of education are forced to spend much time of their education to learn factual information. In the other words they have not educated enough for their futur life and work.

Nowadays the use of social media such as Facebook, Twitter and so on is becoming more popular than one-on-one conversations in person. Do you think the advantages of this development outweigh the disadvantages? Give your opinion and examples from your own experience
.
It is a fact that the Internet technology has helped people in connecting with their relatives and friends without the boundaries of distance and cost. While there are certainly valid arguments to the contrary, I personally believe that the benefits of the social media far outweigh its drawbacks.
First of all, the Internet allows people to get in touch with their families, friends and relatives who live in other countries. For instance, some students go abroad to continue their education, or some people migrate to foreign countries to develop their professional works. By the Internet existence, they are able to interact and communicate with their families, even if they are limited by many miles away from their homes. And they can know about their families’ condition.
On the other hand, people share their knowledge and information with a vast number of people around of the world. The Internet also makes communication easier, so people can recognize and find a lot of conditions and situations around in other countries.
Despite all the reasons given above, it is an undeniable fact that, using this social media is addictive. A problem has occasionally been seen in people who overspend plenty of time in social networks, checking email, chatting, and so on. While they have necessary personal and professional work. Their performance had reduced in work; this may cause giving up their job.
By way of conclusion, I believe that the Internet especially the social media has had a positive impact on the modern life style. In my opinion, people must manage between their leisure times and their work.