Some people argue that parents should have a strong influence

The question of whether parents should exert substantial influence over their children’s choice of friends and life partners is a contentious one. Some argue that parental intervention is necessary to protect young people from making imprudent choices, while others maintain that autonomy is crucial for personal growth. This essay will examine both perspectives before presenting the view that a balanced approach is the most prudent course of action.

On the one hand, proponents of parental influence argue that parents possess greater wisdom and life experience, which can help young people avoid potentially harmful relationships. Adolescents and young adults often make decisions based on emotions rather than rational judgment, leading them into friendships or romantic partnerships that may be detrimental in the long run. Furthermore, in many cultures, marriages are not just personal unions but also social contracts that impact family reputation and stability. Consequently, parental involvement in selecting a suitable spouse can ensure compatibility in terms of values, socioeconomic status, and long-term goals, thereby increasing the likelihood of a successful marriage.

On the other hand, it is widely believed that young individuals should be entrusted with the freedom to choose their own social circles and life partners, as this is an essential part of personal development. When young people are allowed to navigate relationships independently, they learn valuable lessons about human interactions, responsibility, and emotional resilience. Additionally, excessive parental control may lead to resentment and hinder the development of decision-making skills, which are crucial for adulthood. In modern societies, individual happiness often takes precedence over traditional norms, and people tend to prioritize emotional compatibility over parental approval in relationships. Therefore, autonomy in these matters can foster self-confidence and emotional maturity.

In my opinion, while parents should offer guidance based on their experience, their influence should not be overly restrictive. Encouraging open discussions and sharing concerns in a constructive manner can help young people make informed choices without feeling pressured. Ultimately, decisions regarding friendships and life partners should be a collaborative effort where parental advice is considered but not imposed.

Highlighted Academic Vocabulary in the sample of Some people argue that parents should have a strong influence

1. Substantial (/səbˈstænʃəl/) – The company made a substantial investment in renewable energy.
2. Intervention (/ˌɪntərˈvɛnʃən/) – Government intervention is necessary to regulate the housing market.
3. Detrimental (/ˌdɛtrəˈmɛntəl/) – Excessive screen time can have a detrimental impact on children’s cognitive development.
4. Entrusted (/ɪnˈtrʌstɪd/) – The manager entrusted her assistant with overseeing the entire project.
5. Restrictive (/rɪˈstrɪktɪv/) – Some countries have restrictive policies regarding immigration.

Advanced Grammar Structures and Their Impact:

1. Complex Sentences with Concessions:
   • Example: While parents should offer guidance based on their experience, their influence should not be overly restrictive.
   • This adds depth to the argument by acknowledging both sides of the debate.
2. Relative Clauses:
   • Example: Excessive parental control may lead to resentment and hinder the development of decision-making skills, which are crucial for adulthood.
   • This enhances clarity and provides additional details concisely.
3. Nominalization for Formality:
   • Example: Encouraging open discussions and sharing concerns in a constructive manner can help young people make informed choices.
   • This technique makes the writing sound more academic and objective.
4. Passive Voice for Impartiality:
   • Example: Decisions regarding friendships and life partners should be a collaborative effort where parental advice is considered but not imposed.
   • This helps maintain a neutral and formal tone.
5. Cohesive Devices and Parallel Structures:
   • Example: Autonomy in these matters can foster self-confidence and emotional maturity.
   • Parallel structure enhances fluency and readability.